Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Legislation shows fluid nature of national politics

Legislation shows fluid nature of national politics

  • 0

Mark Twain sent a telegram from London to the New York Journal in 1897 explaining the reports of his death had been exaggerated after rumors surfaced the famous writer was dead or at least seriously ill.

The same held true last week regarding a piece of legislation to rename the post office in Clarinda. As a result, I had my first taste of the fluid nature of reporting on national politics since facts can turn 180 degrees in only a few hours.

As a bit of background, Rep. Cindy Axne authored a bill she unveiled in Clarinda in July to designate the local post office the Jessie Field Shambaugh Postal Building in honor of the former educated and Page County School Superintendent regarded as the “Mother of 4-H.” The bill passed both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate in December and was sent to the President to be signed into law.

However, at 9:30 a.m. Tuesday, Jan. 5, I was notified by Axne’s office the bill had not been signed Monday night and had died. This meant the bill would have to be reintroduced and again passed by Congress.

The timing of this notification created a rare dilemma because our press deadline is noon on Tuesday. I had to determine if the announcement was newsworthy enough to be included in that week’s edition, how quickly the story could be written and if I could change the design of the front page and the page the story would conclude on prior to deadline. Allowing for time to finalize the pages and electronically move them to the printer, I had two hours to work with.

Since I had been covering the status of the bill since July, I determined the story was worth inclusion in the paper and may be “old news” a week from then. Since I had prior stories on the bill available to pull information from, I was confident the story could be written fairly quickly and I had a plan on how to adjust the design of the pages.

Therefore, I set about my tasks and successfully included the article in the Jan. 7 edition of the Clarinda Herald-Journal. Given the local interest of the story, it was also included in the Jan. 6 edition of the Valley News Today.

I was pleased we were able to share this information with our readers in such a timely fashion. That was, until my phone rang at 9:30 a.m. Wednesday morning. An official with Axne’s office explained to me they had been misinformed about the deadline for signing the bill. The bill was still eligible for approval Tuesday night and had in fact been signed by the President that night.

After receiving an explanation of the misinformation Axne’s office had received Tuesday morning regarding the bill, I wrote a revised story clarifying the status of the bill that was placed on our website and a link to that story was shared on Facebook. However, since the Clarinda Herald-Journal had already been published, there was nothing I could do correct the story that appeared on the front page of the Jan. 7 edition.

Similarly, the Jan. 6 edition of the Shenandoah Valley News had been published with the story about the bill not being signed. The Shenandoah Valley News ran a corrected story explaining the unfortunate circumstances that transpired in its Jan. 9 edition and an updated version of the story confirming the signing appears in today’s Clarinda Herald-Journal.

In my 27 year career, this was the first time I knew an article that appeared in our paper was incorrect. However, there is no one to blame for the article that appeared last week. The staff with Axne’s office relayed the facts as they knew them Tuesday morning about the bill and I reported those facts. When those facts changed, everyone involved took immediate action inform our readers, and the public in general, of those changes.

It was simply a matter of unfortunate timing. Had the reports been received Monday and Tuesday, the corrected information could have been presented last week. If the initial report had been received Tuesday afternoon, that version of the story would not have made it to print.

I love movies and there are several excellent ones that show the work of newspapers. Some of the best known movies are All the President’s Men, The Paper and Spotlight. There is a scene in The Paper with a staff meeting where the legitimacy of an arrest is being debated. If proof the suspects are innocent is not available by press time, it is decided the original story of the arrest will run and the paper will the correct the information the next day.

“We taint ‘em today and make ‘em look good on Saturday. Everybody is happy,” the character played by Glenn Close says.

I never liked that idea and believe journalists should strive to do better if at all possible. However, in an environment like we have today where news can change in a heartbeat, I have a better understanding of why she said that. I still don’t like it, but sometimes you have to go with what you know at the time.

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.